Nelson v. Precythe et al
| Saleem M. Nelson |
| Mark Trusty, Theresa Thornburg, Ryan Crews, Dean Minor, Anne L. Precythe and Dennis Allen |
| 2:2019cv00019 |
| March 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry E. Autrey. (DJO)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Mar 11 16:01:30 CDT 2019 (admin,)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DJO)
|
|
Filing 4
Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Saleem M. Nelson. (DJO)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Saleem M. Nelson. (DJO)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Saleem M. Nelson. (DJO)
|
|
Filing 1
DCM COMPLAINT against defendant Dennis Allen, Ryan Crews, Dean Minor, Anne L. Precythe, Theresa Thornburg, Mark Trusty Jury Demand,, filed by Saleem M. Nelson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment 1 - 6, #3 Original Filing Form, #4 Judge Assignment Label, #5 Envelope)(DJO)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
