O'Keefe v. Saul
Plaintiff: Christine L. O'Keefe
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 2:2019cv00043
Filed: June 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Clark
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER/ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following cases shall be transferred to the Honorable Stephen R. Clark, U.S. District Judge. All deadlines previously set remain in effect unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Case reassigned to Honorable Stephen R Clark for all further proceedings. District Judge John A. Ross no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 7/18/19. (KKS)
June 19, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Christine L. O'Keefe. Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 6/17/2019, answer due 8/16/2019. (KKS)
June 19, 2019 Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Nicholas P. Llewellyn for Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Llewellyn, Nicholas)
June 10, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to defendant Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. The summons was hand delivered to USMS. (JAB)
June 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis [#2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue on the complaint. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 6/7/19. (JAB)
June 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following provisions apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: This case is assigned to Track: 4. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 6/7/19. (JAB) (Main Document 4 replaced on 6/10/2019) (JAB).
June 7, 2019 Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable John A. Ross. (MFG)
June 6, 2019 Filing 3 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT - CJA 23 by Plaintiff Christine L. O'Keefe. (Camp, David)
June 6, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Christine L. O'Keefe. (Camp, David)
June 6, 2019 Filing 1 Social Security COMPLAINT Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - Yes,, filed by Christine L. O'Keefe. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Camp, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'Keefe v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christine L. O'Keefe
Represented By: David D. Camp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Nicholas P. Llewellyn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?