Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc.
| Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company |
| Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv00052 |
| July 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John M Bodenhausen |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. waiver signed on 8/15/2019, answer due 10/15/2019. (Young, Teresa) |
| Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Steven H. Schwartz for Plaintiff Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company. (Schwartz, Steven) |
| Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Steven H. Schwartz. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. (MFG) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company Process Server: Valerie Summer (MFG) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company. Parent companies: Tokio Marine North America, Inc., Subsidiaries: Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Company,. (Young, Teresa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against defendant Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. with receipt number AMOEDC-7323740, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Original Filing Form, #5 Form Notice of Intent to Use Process Server, #6 Summons)(Young, Teresa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Preferred Family Healthcare, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Teresa M. Young |
| Represented By: | Steven H. Schwartz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
