MGPI of Indiana, LLC v. Barrel 53 Cooperage, LLC
| MGPI of Indiana, LLC |
| Barrel 53 Cooperage, LLC |
| 2:2019cv00056 |
| July 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Nannette A Baker |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Attorney David Gregory Brown's Verified Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. [Doc. 2.] Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on August 16, 2019. (EMM)
|
| Notice from Clerk instructing Plaintiff MGPI of Indiana, LLC to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 8/15/2019. (KJS) |
| Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff MGPI of Indiana, LLC Process Server: Nicole Bucklew (BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to attorney David Gregory Brown. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker. (BAK) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice David Gregory Brown. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-7333462) by Plaintiff MGPI of Indiana, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing David G. Brown)(Brown, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Barrel 53 Cooperage, LLC with receipt number AMOEDC-7333445, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by MGPI of Indiana, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - website, #2 Exhibit B - specifications, #3 Exhibit C - purchase order)(Brown, David) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/16/2019: #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Original Filing Form, #6 Summons) (BAK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MGPI of Indiana, LLC v. Barrel 53 Cooperage, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MGPI of Indiana, LLC | |
| Represented By: | David Gregory Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Barrel 53 Cooperage, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
