Hays v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
| J. Patrick Hays |
| Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP, Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00031 |
| April 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Matthew T Schelp |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is STAYED pending the potential transfer of this case by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a notice with the Court within ten (10) days of any decision by the JPML regarding transfer of this case. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on May 10, 2021. (BRP)
|
| Filing 11 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Syngenta Crop Protection LLC. Parent companies: Syngenta AG,. (Nester, Michael) |
| Filing 10 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate to Defendants Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every non-governmental organizational party must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within ten (10) days of the party's first pleading or entry of appearance. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). (Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 5/8/2021.) (TMT) |
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Stay Pending Potential Transfer of this Action by The Judicial Panel on Multridistrict Litigation by Defendant Syngenta Crop Protection LLC. (Nester, Michael) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael J. Nester for Defendant Syngenta Crop Protection LLC. (Nester, Michael) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by J. Patrick Hays (Paul, Richard) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to defendant Chevron U.S.A. Inc.. The summons was emailed to R. Paul. (KCD) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff J. Patrick Hays Process Server: HPS Process Service (Paul, Richard) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Amendment to #1 Complaint, 3 Summons(es) issued, Jury demand, , filed by J. Patrick Hays. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by J. Patrick Hays. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Paul, Richard) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/28/2021: #2 Certificate of Service) (KXS). |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S ORDER (GJL) - Due to electronic case opening, the above numbered case was inadvertently opened in error in the Eastern Division. Therefore, this case will be administratively closed. The new case number in the Northern Division is 2:21cv31 MTS (BAK) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff J. Patrick Hays Process Server: HPS Process Service (Paul, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-8586503, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by J. Patrick Hays. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Paul, Richard) |
| Case Opening Notification: 3 Summons(es) issued. The summons were emailed to attorney Richard Monroe Paul, III. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Matthew T. Schelp. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
