BNSF Railway Company v. Dyno Nobel, Inc.
| BNSF Railway Company |
| Dyno Nobel, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00008 |
| February 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Matthew T Schelp |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #9 Memorandum & Order, by Plaintiff BNSF Railway Company filed by Plaintiff BNSF Railway Company. (Knight, Chad) |
Filing 11
ORDER: This matter is before the Court on review of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, Doc. #10 . The Court notes that, like the original Complaint, Doc. #1 , the First Amended Complaints own allegations demonstrate the Court does not have diversity jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a) for the same reasons the Court already explained and cited. See Doc. #9 . Plaintiff is directed to read the Courts entire Memorandum and Order dated April 24, 2023, Doc. #9 , and, as previously ordered, show cause no later than Thursday, April 27, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Show Cause Response due by 4/27/2023.) Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 4/26/2023. (BRP)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Dyno Nobel, Inc. Amendment to #1 Complaint, , filed by BNSF Railway Company. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by BNSF Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Knight, Chad) |
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause, no later than Thursday, April 27, 2023, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Show Cause Response due by 4/27/2023.) Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on April 24, 2023. (BRP)
|
| Filing 8 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Stephen R. Welby termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Matthew T. Schelp and District Judge Matthew T. Schelp for all further proceedings (JMP) |
| Notice from Clerk instructing Plaintiff BNSF Railway Company, Defendant Dyno Nobel, Inc. to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 4/17/2023. (KJS) |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants Dyno Nobel, Inc., Dyno Nobel Holdings IV LLC, Incitec Pivot Limited.. (Thomas, William) |
| Filing 6 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Defendant Dyno Nobel, Inc.. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). (KJS) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by William S. Thomas for Defendant Dyno Nobel, Inc.. (Thomas, William) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Dyno Nobel, Inc. Dyno Nobel, Inc. waiver signed on 2/28/2023, answer due 5/1/2023. (Thomas, William) |
| Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Welby. 1 Waiver(s) of Service issued. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within 10 days of the filing of the first pleading or entry of appearance # (moed-0001.pdf). (JDC) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiffs BNSF Railway Company, Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC, National Indemnity Company, Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.. (Knight, Chad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Dyno Nobel, Inc. with receipt number AMOEDC-9809739, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by BNSF Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #4 Waiver of Service Waiver of Service)(Knight, Chad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BNSF Railway Company v. Dyno Nobel, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BNSF Railway Company | |
| Represented By: | Chad Knight |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dyno Nobel, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | William S. Thomas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
