Williams v. United States et al
| Brayon Williams |
| Andrew Bailey, United States, Kamala Harris, State of Missouri, Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and Joe Biden |
| 2:2024cv00074 |
| October 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Matthew T Schelp |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's unsigned filings in this matter are STRICKEN, and this action is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 11/27/2024. (KCD)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 17. Wed Nov 27 14:23:56 CST 2024 (Davis, Kinica)
|
| Filing 16 Complaint of Judicial Misconduct or Disability by Petitioner Brayon Williams. (TMT) |
| Filing 15 PRO SE MOTION for Fast and Speedy Action by Petitioner Brayon Williams. (TMT) |
| Filing 14 PRO SE MOTION for Proper Jurisdiction and Suggestions in Support of Writ by Petitioner Brayon Williams. (TMT) |
| Filing 13 SECOND AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Mandamus by Petitioner Brayon Williams. (TMT) |
| Filing 12 SECOND MOTION AMENDED for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Brayon Williams. (TMT) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Reconsider re #10 Memorandum & Order, by Petitioner Brayon Williams. (BRP) |
|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than Friday, November 22, 2024, Plaintiff shall submit signed versions of his filings in compliance with this Memorandum and Order. If Plaintiff fails to do so, the Court will strike his filings, which, without any pleadings, motions, or other papers on file, will result in dismissal of this action. (Response to Court due by 11/22/2024.). Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 11/01/2024. (KCD)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 10. Fri Nov 1 13:26:45 CDT 2024 (Davis, Kinica)
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Brayon Williams. (TMT) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Mandamus by Petitioner Brayon Williams. (TMT) |
| Filing 7 RETURN LETTER from clerk to Petitioner, Brayon Williams re: Returned Documents. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Returned Documents) (TMT) |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT REMOVED AND RETURNED TO PETITIONER; SEE ECF #7 - PRO SE MOTION for Fast and Speedy Action by Petitioner Brayon Williams. (KCD) Modified on 10/23/2024 (TMT). |
| Filing 5 DOCUMENT REMOVED AND RETURNED TO PETITIONER; SEE ECF #7 - PRO SE MOTION for proper jurisdiction and suggestions in support of Writ by Petitioner Brayon Williams. (KCD) Modified on 10/23/2024 (TMT). |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Brayon Williams. (TMT) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Brayon Williams. (TMT) |
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by Petitioner Brayon Williams. (TMT) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Matthew T. Schelp. (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Oct 11 14:02:15 CDT 2024 (admin,) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus by Petitioner Brayon Williams. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
