Woods v. Armontrout

Woods v. Armontrout

Petitioner:	Burton D. Woods, III
Respondent:	Bill Armontrout
Case Number:	4:1984cv00783
Filed:	April 4, 1984
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:	Terry I. Adelman
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 19, 2014	Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Burton D. Woods' Motion for Reconsideration and to Alter or Amend Pursuant to Rule 59(e) (filed June 19, 2013/Docket No. 8) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as a second or successive habeas petition. re: 8 MOTION for Reconsideration re 7 Memorandum & Order, MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Petitioner Burton D. Woods, III. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 3/19/14. (KKS) (Main Document 10 replaced on 3/19/2014 per chambers to correct formatting) (KKS).
May 28, 2013	Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue as to Respondent, because the instant motion to vacate is successive under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Burton D. Woods Motion for Relief from Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) (filed January 4, 2013/Docket No. 2 ) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 5/28/13. (KJS)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 19, 2014

Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Burton D. Woods' Motion for Reconsideration and to Alter or Amend Pursuant to Rule 59(e) (filed June 19, 2013/Docket No. 8) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as a second or successive habeas petition. re: 8 MOTION for Reconsideration re 7 Memorandum & Order, MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Petitioner Burton D. Woods, III. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 3/19/14. (KKS) (Main Document 10 replaced on 3/19/2014 per chambers to correct formatting) (KKS).

May 28, 2013

Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue as to Respondent, because the instant motion to vacate is successive under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Burton D. Woods Motion for Relief from Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) (filed January 4, 2013/Docket No. 2 ) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 5/28/13. (KJS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woods v. Armontrout
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Burton D. Woods, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Bill Armontrout
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?