Winfield v. Roper, et al

Winfield v. Roper, et al

Petitioner:	John E. Winfield
Respondent:	Don Roper
Case Number:	4:2003cv00192
Filed:	February 14, 2003
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Washington
Presiding Judge:	Catherine D. Perry
Nature of Suit:	Death Penalty
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 23, 2015	Filing 110 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall lift the ex parte restrictions from petitioner's Ex Parte Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Approval of Attorney Fees and Expenses [ECF No. 106 ]. Each of the exhibits should be made public as well, except for Exhibit A, which should be placed under seal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on the United States Attorney's Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDER ED that the United States is invited to submit a brief as amicus curiae no later than May 22, 2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner may file a response brief no later than June 5, 2015. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 04/23/2015. (CBL)
September 9, 2010	Filing 87 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's "motion to lodge successive petition for writ of habeas corpus pending consideration by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals" [Doc. 85] is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 9/9/2010. (MGK)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 23, 2015

Filing 110 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall lift the ex parte restrictions from petitioner's Ex Parte Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Approval of Attorney Fees and Expenses [ECF No. 106 ]. Each of the exhibits should be made public as well, except for Exhibit A, which should be placed under seal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on the United States Attorney's Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDER ED that the United States is invited to submit a brief as amicus curiae no later than May 22, 2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner may file a response brief no later than June 5, 2015. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 04/23/2015. (CBL)

September 9, 2010

Filing 87 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's "motion to lodge successive petition for writ of habeas corpus pending consideration by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals" [Doc. 85] is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 9/9/2010. (MGK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Winfield v. Roper, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: John E. Winfield
Represented By:	Kent E. Gipson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Don Roper
Represented By:	Andrew W. Hassell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?