Holder v. USA

Holder v. USA

Petitioner:	Norris G. Holder
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	4:2003cv00923
Filed:	December 14, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
Presiding Judge:	E. Richard Webber
Nature of Suit:	Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 19, 2016	Filing 145 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that United States' Motion to Dismiss Motion for Order Granting Access to Examine and Test Ballistics Evidence [ECF No. 137 ] is GRANTED. Movant Norris Holder, Jr.'s Notice of Changed Economic Circumstances and Motion to Stay Order of Restitution [ECF No. 135 ] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. The amount to be taken from Holder's prison account is limited to $30.00 per month with no less than $450 .00 remaining in Holders account at any time. Movant Norris Holder, Jr.'s Motion for Order Granting Access to Examine and Test Ballistics Evidence [ECF No. 128 ] is DENIED. Movant Norris Holder, Jr.'s Motion to Amend Motion for Order Granting Access to Examine and Test Ballistics Evidence [ECF No. 132 ] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 5/19/2016. (CBL)
December 14, 2009	Filing 99 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Norris G. Holder's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e) [doc. #90] is DENIED. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 12/14/09. (RJD)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 19, 2016

Filing 145 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that United States' Motion to Dismiss Motion for Order Granting Access to Examine and Test Ballistics Evidence [ECF No. 137 ] is GRANTED. Movant Norris Holder, Jr.'s Notice of Changed Economic Circumstances and Motion to Stay Order of Restitution [ECF No. 135 ] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. The amount to be taken from Holder's prison account is limited to $30.00 per month with no less than $450 .00 remaining in Holders account at any time. Movant Norris Holder, Jr.'s Motion for Order Granting Access to Examine and Test Ballistics Evidence [ECF No. 128 ] is DENIED. Movant Norris Holder, Jr.'s Motion to Amend Motion for Order Granting Access to Examine and Test Ballistics Evidence [ECF No. 132 ] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 5/19/2016. (CBL)

December 14, 2009

Filing 99 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Norris G. Holder's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e) [doc. #90] is DENIED. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 12/14/09. (RJD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holder v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Norris G. Holder
Represented By:	Michael J. Gorla
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Steven E. Holtshouser
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?