Cole v. Kendricks et al
Plaintiff: Megal S. Cole
Defendant: Daniel Sayle and Larry Kendricks
Case Number: 4:2005cv01388
Filed: August 30, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
Presiding Judge: Mary Ann L Medler
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2005. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2005 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Wed Dec 14 12:48:53 CST 2005 (ARL, )
December 14, 2005 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Wed Dec 14 12:52:57 CST 2005 (ARL, )
December 13, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL pursuant to 28USC1915(e)(2)(B) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28USC1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge Henry E. Autrey on 12/13/05. (ARL)
December 13, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: #2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $0.67 within thirty days from the date of this order. Plaintiff is instructed to make hisremittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," andto include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint because the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or both. See 28 U.S.C.1915(e)(2)(B). An appropriate order shall accompany this order and memorandum. Signed by Judge Henry E. Autrey on 12/13/05. (ARL)
August 31, 2005 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Aug 31 10:01:46 CDT 2005 (admin,)
August 31, 2005 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (SAJ, )
August 30, 2005 Filing 3 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Megal S. Cole. (SAJ, )
August 30, 2005 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Megal S. Cole. (SAJ, )
August 30, 2005 Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT Jury Demand,, filed by Megal S. Cole. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet #2 Original Filing Form#3 Envelope)(SAJ, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cole v. Kendricks et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Sayle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Kendricks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megal S. Cole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?