Harris v. Department of Veterans' Affairs
| 4:2006cv00463 |
| March 14, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment 33 is granted. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 9/17/08. (BAK)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 1 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this order to pay the $250.00 filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee within 30 days, the Court will dismiss this action, without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plainiff's motion for appointment of counsel 4 is DENIED. Response to Court due by 4/21/2006. Signed by Judge Catherine D. Perry on 3/21/06. (BAK, ) Modified on 3/22/2006 (BAK, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harris v. Department of Veterans' Affairs | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
