Bonner v. Luebbers
Case Number: 4:2006cv00613
Filed: April 11, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
Presiding Judge: Henry E. Autrey
Presiding Judge: Thomas C. Mummert
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Amended Petition of Laurence Bonner for Writ of Habeas Corpus, [Doc. No. 2 ], pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability will no t issue in that, as Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. A separate judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 7/7/09. (CSR)
June 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 Amended Complaint, filed by Laurence Bonner, 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00.) filed by Laurence Bonner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 petition of Laurence Bonner be DENIED without further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 6/22/2009. Signed by Mag Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on June 10, 2009. (MCB) Modified on 6/11/2009 (MCB).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bonner v. Luebbers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?