Bonner v. Luebbers
4:2006cv00613 |
April 11, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
Henry E. Autrey |
Thomas C. Mummert |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Amended Petition of Laurence Bonner for Writ of Habeas Corpus, [Doc. No. 2 ], pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability will no t issue in that, as Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. A separate judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 7/7/09. (CSR) |
Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 Amended Complaint, filed by Laurence Bonner, 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00.) filed by Laurence Bonner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 petition of Laurence Bonner be DENIED without further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 6/22/2009. Signed by Mag Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on June 10, 2009. (MCB) Modified on 6/11/2009 (MCB). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bonner v. Luebbers | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.