Orthoarm, Inc. v. Forestadent USA, Inc. et al
Case Number: 4:2006cv00730
Filed: May 3, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
Presiding Judge: Charles A. Shaw
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 215 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is DENIED. [Doc. 189] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs Alternative and Joint Motion for a New Trial is DENIED. [Doc. 191]IT IS FURTHER ORDER ED that plaintiffs motion for oral argument on their postjudgment motions is DENIED. [Doc. 213] re: 213 MOTION for Hearing re 189 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law, 191 MOTION for New Trial (Alternative and Joint Motion for New Trial) filed by Plaintiff G.A.C. International, Inc., Plaintiff Orthoarm, Inc., 189 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law filed by G.A.C. International, Inc., Orthoarm, Inc., 191 MOTION for New Trial (Alternative and Joint Motion for New Trial) filed by G.A.C. International, Inc., Orthoarm, Inc.. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 10/21/08. (JWJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Orthoarm, Inc. v. Forestadent USA, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?