NetBank et al v. Williams et al
| 4:2006cv01295 |
| August 28, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Henry E. Autrey |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
140
CONSENT JUDGMENT (Partial) 139 : ORDERED AND ADJUGDED that the joint motion for consent judgment is Granted, and judgment against defts Felita Williams and Williams Financial in amount of $151,387.00 plus post judgment interest at rate of.93% from the date the judgment is entered through the date the judgment is fully satisfied, is hereby entered.. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 1/9/09. (CEL)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER re 125 ORDERED that the Motion for Default Judgment, [Doc. No. 125], in the amount of $215,188.07 is granted against Garnishee, Christian Academy. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is ordered to send this Order to Garnishee through the United States Mail at: The Christian Academy, 11637 W. Florissant Avenue, Florissant, Missouri 63033. (cc: Christian Academy). Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 9/11/08. (CEL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NetBank et al v. Williams et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
