Epice Corporation v. Land Reutilization Authority of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, The et al
Epice Corporation |
Land Reutilization Authority of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, The, James W. Murphy, Ronald A. Leggett and St. Louis, Missouri, City of |
4:2007cv00206 |
January 25, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - City |
Henry E. Autrey |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 190 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Attorneys Fees, [Doc. No.s 146 and 150], is denied. 146 150 (See Order for further details.) Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 8/23/2010. (CBL) |
Filing 188 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants the Land Reutilization Authority of St. Louis and the City of St. Louis' Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I, 181 , is Granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered this same date. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 8/17/10. (TRC) |
Filing 187 OPINION, MEMORANDUM, AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant City of St. Louis' Motion for Summary Judgment on Count III, 166 , is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment shall be entered upon the resolution of the remaining issues in this matter. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 8/5/10. (TRC) |
Filing 177 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Courts Opinion, Memorandum and Order dated December 4, 2009, is amended nunc pro tunc, as follows: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants The Land Reutilization Authority of the City of St. L ouis and the City of St. Louis Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 110] is granted as to Counts I on all issues except Plaintiffs claim that Defendants violated 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 by taking Plaintiffs property without just compensation, II, and IV and denied on Count III. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 6/10/10. (CLA) |
Filing 145 MEMORANDUM OPINION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pltff.'s mtn. for partial summary jgm. is denied. IT IS FURTHR ORDERED that defts. The Land Reutilization Authority of the City of St. Louis and the City of St. Louis' mtn. for partial sum. jgm. is granted as to counts I, II, and IV and denied on count III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defts. Daly and Murphy's mtn. for sum. jgm. is granted. 110 112 108 Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 12/4/09. (CLA) |
Filing 120 OPINION, MEMORANDUM, AND ORDER re 95 and 99 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, 95 and 99 , are denied. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 9/28/09. (TRC) |
Filing 93 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 65 83 67 63 89 : ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend by Interlineation its Third Amended Complaint, [Doc. No. 67], is denied. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint within 7 days from the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the trial setting of December 8, 2008 is vacated, to be reset after the parties submit their Amended Case Management Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Leggett and Murphy's Motion for Sum mary Judgment, [Doc. No. 63], Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 65], and Defendants Land Reutilization Authority of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, LRA, and the City of St. Louis' Joint Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 68], are denied, without prejudice to refiling, as provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Motion in Limine filed by Defendants Leggett and Murphy, [Doc. No. 83], and the Joint Motion in Limine filed by LRA and the City of St . Louis, [Doc. No. 89], are denied without prejudice to refiling, as provided herein.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall, within 14 days from thedate of this Order meet, prepare and submit to the Court an Amended CaseManagement Order, as detailed herein.( Response to Court due by 12/10/2008.). Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 11/26/08. (CEL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.