Tilda Ltd v. Riceland Foods, Inc. et al
| Tilda Ltd |
| Producers Rice Mill Inc., Riceland Foods, Inc., Bayer CropScience Inc. and Bayer CropScience LP |
| 4:2007cv00457 |
| March 7, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion to compel subpoenaed documents from J.W. Allen [#1477, 1478] is GRANTED and J.W.Allen Company, Inc. and International Shipholding Corporation d/b/a LCIShipholdings, Inc., must produce all documents covered by the subpoenas no later than October 8, 2009. Response to Court due by 10/8/2009. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on September 28, 2009. (MGK)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions [#92 in 4:07CV457], [#131in 4:07CV1211], [#36 in 4:08CV499] to compel production of sworn depositiontestimony from Schafer, et al. v. Riceland Foods, Inc., et al. are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion [#1047 in 4:06MD1811] to compel Riceland Foods, Inc. to produce hedging information is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 2/20/09. Associated Cases: 4:06-md-01811-CDP, 4:07-cv-00457-CDP, 4:07-cv-01211-CDP, 4:08-cv-00499-CDP(RJD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
