Daugherty v. Dormire

Daugherty v. Dormire

Petitioner:	Ricky J. Daugherty
Respondent:	Dave Dormire
Case Number:	4:2007cv01530
Filed:	August 27, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Cole
Presiding Judge:	Henry E. Autrey
Presiding Judge:	Mary Ann L. Medler
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 18, 2009	Filing 22 JUDGMENT - ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Petition of Ricky J. Daugherty pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court will not issue a certificate of appealability as Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 5/18/09. (CEL)
October 22, 2008	Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the Petition filed by Petitioner for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be DENIED; Doc. 1IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that for the reasons stated herein, any motion byPetitioner for a certificate of appealability should be DENIED.The parties are advised that Petitioner has eleven (11) days in which to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), unless an extension of time for good cause is obtained, and that failure to file timely objections may result in a waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. See Thompson v. Nix, 897 F.2d 356 (8th Cir. 1990). Signed by Mag Judge Mary Ann L. Medler on 10/22/08. (LAH, )

Date Filed

Document Text

May 18, 2009

Filing 22 JUDGMENT - ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Petition of Ricky J. Daugherty pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court will not issue a certificate of appealability as Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 5/18/09. (CEL)

October 22, 2008

Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the Petition filed by Petitioner for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be DENIED; Doc. 1IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that for the reasons stated herein, any motion byPetitioner for a certificate of appealability should be DENIED.The parties are advised that Petitioner has eleven (11) days in which to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), unless an extension of time for good cause is obtained, and that failure to file timely objections may result in a waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. See Thompson v. Nix, 897 F.2d 356 (8th Cir. 1990). Signed by Mag Judge Mary Ann L. Medler on 10/22/08. (LAH, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daugherty v. Dormire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Ricky J. Daugherty
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Dave Dormire
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?