Taylor v. St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners, et al.
Plaintiff: |
Judith A. Taylor |
Defendant: |
Chaim H. Zimbalist, St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners, William Miller, Jr., Anita Yeckel and John A. Diehl, Jr. |
Case Number: |
4:2007cv01544 |
Filed: |
August 30, 2007 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Office: |
St. Louis Office |
County: |
St. Louis - County |
Presiding Judge: |
Thomas C. Mummert |
Presiding Judge: |
|
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
Jury Demanded By: |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
July 23, 2009 |
Filing
95
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case is removed from the trial docket beginning July 27, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED as moot. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that counsel shall file, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, the papers necessary for a final judgment. Response to Court due by 8/23/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 7/23/09. (RJD)
|
April 30, 2009 |
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. ORDERED that Defendant Board's motion for leave to supplement its motion for summary judgment [Doc. 64 ] is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that the joint motion to strike portions of Plaintiff's affidavit filed by all Defend ants [Doc. 59 ] is GRANTED in part as to the challenged portions of paragraphs 10 and 18, and as to paragraphs 25 and 26 only to the extent those paragraphs are directed to Defendants Miller and Zimbalist, and is DENIED in part to the extent paragra phs 25 and 26 are directed to Defendants Yeckel and Diehl. FURTHER ORDERED that the Board's motion for summary judgment [Doc. 50 ] is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that individual Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. 48 ] is GRANTED. FINALLY ORDERED that.this matter is set for a conference on May 12, 2009, at 10:30 a.m. in chambers to schedule a trial date. Signed by Mag Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 4/30/09. (KLH)
|
January 13, 2009 |
Filing
68
ORDER granting 67 Motion to Amend/Correct case management order by rescheduling the trial date and the filing deadline for pre-trial compliance materials. This motion is GRANTED. The case is removed from the trial docket of February 9, 2009, and will be reset after the Court rules on the pending motions for summary judgment. Signed by Mag Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on January 13, 2009. (MCB)
|
October 28, 2008 |
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 40 MOTION to Compel filed by Plaintiff Judith A. Taylor, 37 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Expert filed by Defendant William Miller, Jr., Defendant Chaim H. Zimbalist, Defendant John A. Diehl, Jr., Defendant St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners, Defendant Anita Yeckel, 45 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Defendant William Miller, Jr., Defendant Chaim H. Zimbalist, Defendant John A. Diehl, Jr., Defendant St. Louis County Board of Election C ommissioners, Defendant Anita Yeckel, and 29 MOTION to Compel Production of Plaintiff's Medical Records filed by Defendant William Miller, Jr., Defendant Chaim H. Zimbalist, Defendant John A. Diehl, Jr., Defendant St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners, Defendant Anita Yeckel. Signed by Mag Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 10/28/08. (RJD)
|
September 4, 2008 |
Filing
36
ORDER granting 35 Motion to Reschedule Motion Hearing. Signed by Mag Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 9/4/08. (RJD)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?