Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Con-Way Freight, Inc.
| Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Con-Way Freight, Inc. |
| Roberta M. Hollins |
| 4:2007cv01638 |
| September 20, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Carol E. Jackson |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the bill of costs filed by defendant Con-Way Freight, Inc. [Doc. # 69 ] is granted in part and denied in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and plaint iff-intervenor Roberta M. Hollins shall pay costs to the defendant in the sum of $ 5,016.55. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant's motion for an award of attorneys' fees [Doc. # 67 ] is denied. Signed by Honorable Carol E. Jackson on 02/11/2010; (DJO)
|
|
Filing
66
JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum and Order entered this same date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of defendant Con-Way Freight, Inc., and against plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and plaintiff-intervenor Roberta M. Hollins. Plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor shall bear the costs.. Signed by Honorable Carol E. Jackson on 6/17/09. (KKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
