Walker v. Moline Acres et al
| G. Thomas Walker |
| City of Moline Acres, Fred Hodges, Michele DeShay and Ira Rice |
| 4:2007cv01741 |
| October 12, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Rodney W. Sippel |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 56 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Evans & Dixon, L.L.C. filed by Plaintiff G. Thomas Walker motion is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Rodney W. Sippel on 5/6/09. (LGK)
|
|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 36 MOTION to Dismiss :Counts I and II of First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant City of Moline Acres, Defendant Michele DeShay, Defendant Ira Rice, Defendant Fred Hodges motion is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Rodney W. Sippel on 2/13/09. (LGK)
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 27 Second MOTION to Add Party Plaintiffs MOTION for Leave to Amend Complaint filed by Plaintiff G. Thomas Walker motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Pltf. Walker's motion to amend his complaint is Grant ed as it relates to him only. Movants' request to join as parties is Denied. FURTHER ORDERED that Walker file an amended complaint which contains only his claims within 10 days.( Response to Court due by 12/15/2008.). Signed by Honorable Rodney W. Sippel on 12/3/08. (LGK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
