Burroughs et al v. Mackie Moving Systems Corporation
| John Lee Burroughs and Rose Burroughs |
| Mackie Moving Systems Corporation |
| 4:2007cv01944 |
| November 19, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Charles |
| Mary Ann L. Medler |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
198
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that AMCO's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is DENIED. [Docs. 167, 168] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that AMCO's Alternative Motion for New Trial is DENIED. [Docs. 167, 168] IT IS FUR THER ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion to Alter Judgment is DENIED. [Doc. 176, 177] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that AMCO's Motion to Alter Judgment is GRANTED. [Doc. 169] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Bill of Costs is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as more fully set out herein. [Doc. 165]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Ann L. Medler on 2/17/11. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(LGK)
|
|
Filing
193
MEMORANDUM OPINION: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that AMCO's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is DENIED. [Docs. 167 , 168 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that AMCO's Alternative Motion for New Trial is DENIED. [Docs. 167 , 168 ] IT IS FUR THER ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion to Alter Judgment isDENIED. [Doc. 176 , 177 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that AMCOs Motion to Alter Judgment is GRANTED. [Doc. 169 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Bill of Costs is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as more fully set out herein. [Doc. 165 ] Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Ann L. Medler on 2/15/11. (Attachment: # 1 Exhibit)(ARL)
|
|
Filing
163
MEMORANDUM OPINION - Based on the analysis set out above: 1. The court finds AMCOs coverage on the Burroughs three vehicles can be stacked to the statutory minimum ($25,000 x 3 = $75,000) and stacked with Zurichs $25,000 coverage for a total of $100,000 Uninsured Motorist coverage. 2. The court finds AMCO and Zurich are entitled to a set off of the $295,000 payment which John Burroughs received from Mackie. Since the jury awarded John Burroughs $460,000, the resulti ng liability, considering the policy limits, is $100,000. 3. The court finds that Rose Burroughs may recover from AMCO $40,000 on her Loss of Consortium claim in addition to the $75,000 limit for John Burroughs. 4. The court finds that Zurichs claims for proration of any liability between AMCO and Zurich are best left to the defendants to calculate and work out between themselves. 5. A separate judgment will be entered consistent with these findings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Ann L. Medler on 11/17/10. (LAH)
|
|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM OPINION: ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Strike Report and Opinion Testimony of William Hampton is DENIED. Doc. 77 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Ann L. Medler on 3/24/10. (ARL)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 73 MOTION to Strike 63 Amended Complaint or Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Mackie Moving Systems Corporation motion is DENIED.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Ann L. Medler on 2/12/10. (LGK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
