Boone v. Wal-Mart Assoicates, Inc.

Boone v. Wal-Mart Assoicates, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Glenda Boone
Defendant:	Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Case Number:	4:2008cv00009
Filed:	January 3, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Francois
Presiding Judge:	Henry E. Autrey
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 21, 2009	Filing 89 ORDER: 86 ORDERED that the Motion to Enforce Settlement, [Doc. No. 86] is denied. FURTHER ORDERED counsel shall file, within seven (7) days from the date of this order, a stipulation for dismissal, a motion for leave to voluntarily dismiss, or a proposed consent judgment. Failure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Dismissal Paper(s) due by 10/28/2009. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 10/21/09. (CEL)
April 16, 2009	Filing 56 OPINION, MEMORANDUM, AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 36 is granted in part and denied in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff on Counts I and III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a separate judgment with respect to these counts will be entered upon resolution of the remaining claims. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 4/16/09. (TRC)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 21, 2009

Filing 89 ORDER: 86 ORDERED that the Motion to Enforce Settlement, [Doc. No. 86] is denied. FURTHER ORDERED counsel shall file, within seven (7) days from the date of this order, a stipulation for dismissal, a motion for leave to voluntarily dismiss, or a proposed consent judgment. Failure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Dismissal Paper(s) due by 10/28/2009. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 10/21/09. (CEL)

April 16, 2009

Filing 56 OPINION, MEMORANDUM, AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 36 is granted in part and denied in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff on Counts I and III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a separate judgment with respect to these counts will be entered upon resolution of the remaining claims. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 4/16/09. (TRC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boone v. Wal-Mart Assoicates, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glenda Boone
Represented By:	Robert L. DeVoto
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Represented By:	Eric K. Lau
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?