Maguire v. Franklin County Sheriff's Department et al
Bryan M. Maguire |
Franklin County Sheriff's Department, Eric C. Fruewirth and Ugene Abrare |
4:2008cv00232 |
February 14, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
Franklin |
Charles A. Shaw |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Franklin County, Missouri, Eric C. Fruewirth, and Eugene Aberers motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. [Doc. 23 ] A separate Judgment shall be filed with this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 9/1/09. (KJF, ) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED. [Doc. 7] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Franklin County, Missouri shall be substituted as a defendant for Franklin County Sheriff's Department. The Clerk of Court shall amend the case caption and the short caption to reflect the substitution. The parties are also ordered to use the amended caption, as set forth above, in any future filings with the Court. Re: 7 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Ugene Abrare, Defendant Franklin County Sheriff's Department, Defendant Eric C. Fruewirth motion is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 9/11/2008. (NCL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.