Calvert v. Leopold, et al.
| Pamela Calvert |
| Wallace Leopold, Sr., Bartholomew Saracino, Michael Quinn, Jo Ann Freeman, Chris Goodson and Francis G. Slay |
| 4:2008cv00450 |
| April 3, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
JUDGMENT in favor of Wallace Leopold, Jr against Pamela Calvert. Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on themerits, and the defendant, Wallace Leopold, Jr., recover costs from the plaintiff Pamela Calvert. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 4/13/09. (RJD)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Chris Goodson, JoAnn Freeman Morrow, Julius Hunter, Vincent Bommarito, and Mayor Francis Slay 13 is granted, and plaintiffs' claims against them are dismissed with prejudice. Julius Hunter; Joann Freeman Morrow; Francis G. Slay; Vincent Bommarito and Chris Goodson terminated.. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 1/8/09. (BAK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
