Hunter Engineering Company v. Hennessy Industries, Inc.
| Hunter Engineering Company |
| Hennessy Industries, Inc. |
| 4:2008cv00465 |
| April 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| David D. Noce |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Hunter Engineering Company pay Hennessy Industries, Inc., as reasonable attorneys fees and out-of-pocket costs the sum of $6,384.15 ($9,576.23 less one-third).. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 6/25/2010. (KMS)
|
|
Filing
116
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendant Hennessy Industries, Inc. to show cause (Doc. 100) is granted. Plaintiff Hunter Engineering Company clearly violated the express terms of the protective order. IT IS FURTHER ORDER ED that Hunter Engineering shall not use or disclose any of Hennessy's confidential documents in unrelated proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hunter Engineering shall return to Hennessy Industries, Inc. all of its confidential documents no later than April 19, 2010, and that it shall file a certificate of compliance with the court when it has accomplished this task. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hunter Engineering is held in civil contempt, and that it shall pay Hennessy Industries, Inc. its reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses related to bringing this motion to show cause. Hennessy shall submit an affidavit supporting its attorneys' fees and expenses by April 26, 2010. Hunter may file a response not later than May 17, 2010. 100 Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 3/29/10. (KXS)
|
|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of plaintiff Hunter Engineering Co. to enforce a subpoena duces tecum (Doc. 89) is denied without prejudice. Hunter Engineering may renew its motion in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request of defendant Hennessy Industries, Inc. for costs and fees (Doc. 90 under seal) for defending against the subject motion is denied. 89 Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 11/12/09. (KXS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hunter Engineering Company v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hunter Engineering Company | |
| Represented By: | Rudolph A. Telscher, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hennessy Industries, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
