McDowell et al v. Blankenship et al
| Regina McDowell, SF DOE and Katherine Jones |
| Donald Blankenship, Aaron Pinson, Michael Manley, Mark Wynn and Thomas M. Buchness |
| 4:2008cv00602 |
| April 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Phelps |
| Stephen N. Limbaugh |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
170
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants renewed Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Endorsements (#137) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs shall file their revised deposition designations with the Court in compliance with this Courts pretrial order. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 2/13/13. (MRS)
|
|
Filing
169
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 164 MOTION to Dismiss :Plaintiffs as Improper Parties and to Require Plaintiffs to Join the Real Party in Interest filed by Defendant Mark Wynn, Defendant Michael Manley, Defendant Donald Blankenship, Defendant Aaron Pinson motion is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 2/11/13. (MRS)
|
|
Filing
143
MEMORANDUM..Summary judgment will be granted in part and denied in part. A separate order will issue. Remaining for trial in this matter is plaintiffs' excessive force claim under Count I. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 7/30/12. (MRS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
