McCarty v. Dana Corporation
Plaintiff: E. Janette McCarty
Defendant: Dana Corporation
Case Number: 4:2008cv00690
Filed: May 14, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Carol E. Jackson
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2003 Job Discrimination

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants motion 12 to dismiss for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), is granted.. Signed by Honorable Carol E. Jackson on 11/7/08. (KKS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCarty v. Dana Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: E. Janette McCarty
Represented By: David R. Swimmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dana Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?