Holmes v. United States of America
| Michael James Holmes |
| United States of America |
| 4:2008cv01142 |
| August 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Carol E. Jackson |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of Michael James Holmes for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [Doc. # 83 ] is denied. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 6/28/2017. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER :IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of Michael James Holmes for a certificate of innocence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2513 [Doc. # 42 ] is denied.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for leave to file a supplemental reply and to file exhibits [Doc. ## 54 and 55 ] are granted. 55 MOTION for Leave to File Exhibits to Supplemental Reply in Support of Motion for Certificate of Innocence Under Seal filed by Petitioner Michael James Holmes, 54 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Reply in Support of Motion for Certificate of Innocence filed by Petitioner Michael James Holmes. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 11/3/15. (KKS)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM;... There has been no claim that the government knowingly presented perjured testimony at Holmes's trial and there is nothing to support such a claim. Indeed, it is the Court's firm belief that at the time of the trial the gover nment had no reason to question the credibility of its witnesses. However, the witnesses have now been discredited, and the government would not have been able to meet its burden of proof with the remaining evidence. Thus, for the reasons discussed a bove, the Court finds that Holmes has met his burden of establishing his entitlement to a new trial based on newly discovered. Because Holmes will receive a new trial, it is unnecessary to address his additional claims regarding the admissibility of evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel. A separate Order granting the movant's request for relief will accompany this Memorandum. Signed by Honorable Carol E. Jackson on 09/26/2011; (DJO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Holmes v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael James Holmes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Roger A. Keller, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
