Scaggs et al v. 3M Company et al
Plaintiff: Carl Scaggs and Nellie Scaggs
Defendant: 3M Company and Mine Safety Appliances Company
Case Number: 4:2008cv01163
Filed: August 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office
County: Iron
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 127 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude James S. Johnson, Ph.D., Expert Testimony Relating to the 3M Respirator [doc. #97] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that MSA's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of David Dinkins [doc. #100] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude the Testimony and Expert Report of Defendant's Expert Witness, Dr. Neil Ettinger [doc. #107] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that MSA's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Ching-Tsen Bien and Darell Bevis [doc. #111] is DENIED, with leave to raise objection at trial. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on November 2, 2010. (MCB)
October 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 123 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that MSA's Emergency Motion to Compel Disclosure of Settlement Amount Promised or Received by Plaintiffs from 3M Company and for Reduction of any Potential Judgment Against MSA [doc. #115] is DENIED. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 10/15/2010. (RJD)
October 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 120 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against Mine Safety Appliances ("MSA") Based Upon Negligence Per Se [doc. #72] is DENIED. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 10/6/2010. (RJD)
June 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion of 3M Company to Withdraw Motion for Entry of Protective Order [included in doc. #62] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel [doc. #47] will continue to be held in abeyance by this Court. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 6/3/2010. (RJD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scaggs et al v. 3M Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carl Scaggs
Represented By: Zane T. Cagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nellie Scaggs
Represented By: Zane T. Cagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3M Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mine Safety Appliances Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?