Spurlock v. Ram Leather Care

Spurlock v. Ram Leather Care

Plaintiff:	Eddie Spurlock
Defendant:	Ram Leather Care
Case Number:	4:2008cv01197
Filed:	August 18, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County:	St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge:	Mary Ann L. Medler
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 4, 2008	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to be issued upon the complaint at this tim e. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order. In the amended complaint, plaintiff shall complete in its entirety the court-provided form for filing an employment discrimination com plaint. Specifically, in the "Caption" of the form complaint, plaintiff shall set forth the name of each defendant he wishes to sue, and in the "Statement of Claim," he must set out specific facts against each named defendant cor responding to each of his claims for relief. Plaintiff is also required to submit, as an attachment to his amended complaint, a copy of his notice of right to sue. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff, in addition to a copy of his Memorandum and Order, the court-provided form for filing an employment discrimination complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's failure to amend his complaint in accordance with this Court's instructions will result in a dis missal of this action, without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon the filing of the amended complaint, the Clerk shall resubmit this action to the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(e).. Signed by Honorable Rodney W. Sippel on 9/4/08. (LAH, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 4, 2008

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to be issued upon the complaint at this tim e. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order. In the amended complaint, plaintiff shall complete in its entirety the court-provided form for filing an employment discrimination com plaint. Specifically, in the "Caption" of the form complaint, plaintiff shall set forth the name of each defendant he wishes to sue, and in the "Statement of Claim," he must set out specific facts against each named defendant cor responding to each of his claims for relief. Plaintiff is also required to submit, as an attachment to his amended complaint, a copy of his notice of right to sue. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff, in addition to a copy of his Memorandum and Order, the court-provided form for filing an employment discrimination complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's failure to amend his complaint in accordance with this Court's instructions will result in a dis missal of this action, without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon the filing of the amended complaint, the Clerk shall resubmit this action to the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(e).. Signed by Honorable Rodney W. Sippel on 9/4/08. (LAH, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spurlock v. Ram Leather Care
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eddie Spurlock
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ram Leather Care
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?