Teamsters Local Union No. 688 v. U.S. Foodservice
Plaintiff: Teamsters Local Union No. 688
Defendant: U.S. Foodservice
Case Number: 4:2008cv01609
Filed: October 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Catherine D. Perry
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss [#5] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for hearing [#9] is denied as moot. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on June 10, 2009. (MGK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Teamsters Local Union No. 688 v. U.S. Foodservice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teamsters Local Union No. 688
Represented By: Daniel M. McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Foodservice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?