Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, et al v. Doe Run Resources Corporation, et al
| First State Insurance Company and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company |
| Doe Run Resources Corporation, The and Zurich American Insurance Company |
| 4:2008cv01687 |
| November 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Insurance Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -......IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Hartford's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the Underlying Claims Arise Out of the Release of Pollutants is DENIED without prejudice.[Doc. 139] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Doe Run's Motion for Continuance of Hartford's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 159].. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 4/26/2010. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
112
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that The Doe Run Resources Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Count Three in Hartford's Complaint re: BNSF For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is GRANTED. [Doc. 101] Re: 101 MOTION to Dismiss :Count Three in Hartford's Complaint re: BNSF for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Doe Run Resources Corporation, The motion is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 10/2/2009. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that The Doe Run Resources Corporation's Motion to Stay Counts One, Two and Three of plaintiffs' complaint is DENIED. [Doc. 78]. Re: 78 MOTION to Stay Counts One, Two and Three in Hartford's Complaint filed by Doe Run Resources Corporation, The - motion is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 7/24/2009. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Zurich American Insurance Companys Motion to Reconsider, Set Aside, and Vacate this Courts Order Staying Zurichs Cross-Claim is GRANTED. [Doc. 74] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant The Doe Run Resourc es Corporations motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay defendant Zurich American Insurance Companys cross-claimfor declaratory relief is GRANTED to the extent that Zurichs cross-claim is stayed pending its resolution in the Superior Court of California. [Doc. 43].IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Zurich American Insurance Companys motion for oralargument on its motion to reconsider is DENIED. [Doc. 76]. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 7/23/09. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT ISHEREBYORDERED that defendant TheDoe RunResources Corporations Motion for Certification of April 21, 2009 Interlocutory Order for Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and for Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal is DENIED. [Doc. 67]. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 6/9/09. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant The Doe Run Resources Corporations motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay defendant Zurich American Insurance Companys cross-claim for declaratory relief is GRANTED to the extent that Zurichs cross-claim is stayed pending its resolution in the Superior Court of California. [Doc. 43 ]. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 5/7/09. (KJF, )
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (SEE MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS.) For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs' motion to dismiss Counts I, II and V of Doe Run's counterclaim for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted is DENIED in all respects. [Doc. 15] Re: 15 MOTION to Dismiss :Counts I, II and V of Counterclaim filed by Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company motion is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 4/27/2009. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that The Doe Run Resources Corporations motion for realignment of the parties and to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED. [Doc. 37 ] Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 4/21/09. (KJF, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
