Benford v. Schneider National, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford
Defendant: Schneider National, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2008cv01822
Filed: November 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge: Stephen N Limbaugh
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss (#19) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Stephen N Limbaugh, Jr on 5/13/09. (LAH, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benford v. Schneider National, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schneider National, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?