Hayes v. United States of America

Hayes v. United States of America

Petitioner:	James Glenn Hayes
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	4:2009cv00116
Filed:	January 15, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence Office
County:	St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:	Charles A. Shaw
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 6, 2012	Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant James Glenn Hayess Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant James Glenn Hayes has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right such that reasonable jurists would find the Court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable, or that reasonable jurists would find it debatable whether t he Court was correct in its procedural rulings, and therefore this Court will not issue a certificate of appealability on those claims. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 332, 338 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000). An appropriate judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 3/6/2012. (NCL)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 6, 2012

Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant James Glenn Hayess Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant James Glenn Hayes has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right such that reasonable jurists would find the Court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable, or that reasonable jurists would find it debatable whether t he Court was correct in its procedural rulings, and therefore this Court will not issue a certificate of appealability on those claims. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 332, 338 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000). An appropriate judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 3/6/2012. (NCL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hayes v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: James Glenn Hayes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Sirena M. Wissler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?