McCormick v. Johnston et al
| Matthew McCormick |
| Robert Johnston and The Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis |
| 4:2009cv00140 |
| January 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| P.I.: Other Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendant Archdiocese of St. Louis for summary judgment [Doc. # 103 ] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendant Rev. Robert Johnston for summary judgment [Doc. # 109 ] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants' motions to have facts deemed admitted, legal arguments waived, and for entry of judgment [Doc. # 112 and # 113 ] are granted. Judgment in favor of the defendants will be entered separately. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 10/09/2012; (DJO)
|
|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion [# 72 ] of the Archdiocese of St. Louis to amend the Court's orders dated October 26, 2009 and November 19, 2009 to certify issues for interlocutory appeal, is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED that the Court's orders dated October 26, 2009 [# 63 ] and November 19, 2009 [# 69 ] are each amended to certify the following questions for immediate appeal: 1. Whether the Erie doctrine binds a federal court, sitting in diversity, to a st ate supreme court's finding that a negligent hiring and/or a negligent supervision claim against a religious organization is not legally viable solely because it is barred by the First Amendment? 2. If not, whether this Court's determinatio n that such claims do not violate the First Amendment is erroneous? IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all proceedings in the current action are stayed, pending the outcome of the Archdioceses application to the Court of Appeals for interlocutory review. Signed by Honorable Carol E. Jackson on 02/09/2010; (DJO)
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion [# 50 ] of defendant Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis to dismiss Counts IV, V, and VI of the amended complaint is granted in part and denied in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Count VI of the amended complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim as to defendant Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis. Signed by Honorable Carol E. Jackson on 10/26/2009; (DJO)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to amend his complaint is GRANTED. [Doc. 44] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall detach and docket plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, which was submitted as an attachmen t to the motion for leave. Defendants shall file their answers or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint within thetime permitted by the Federal Rules. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by defendant The Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 39] Denying 39 Motion to Dismiss; granting 44 Motion to Amend/Correct Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 4/13/09. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO OTHER DISTRICT: Case transferred to the Eastern District of Missouri, Denying as moot 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by The Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis. Signed by Chief Judge David R Herndon on 1-20-09. (anj)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. McCormick to SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not construe his failure to timely respond to motion to dismiss as an admission of the merits of the motion and dismiss his claims. Failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of action for lack of prosecution. Show Cause Response due by 10/14/2008. Signed by Chief Judge David R Herndon on 10-1-08. (anj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
