Zike v. Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Missouri, Inc.
| Timothy R. Zike |
| Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Missouri, Inc. |
| 4:2009cv00199 |
| February 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| P.I.: Other Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Thomas C. Mummert |
| Defendant |
| Diversity |
| 28:1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss its counterclaim without prejudice is GRANTED. [Doc. 86] Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 7/21/2010. (RJD)
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment of Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Missouri, Inc., is GRANTED. [Doc. 67] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment of Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Missouri, Inc., to strike is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 75] Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 5/3/2010. (RJD)
|
|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Illinois, Inc., and Counts IV through VI and is DENIED as to Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Missouri, Inc., and Counts I through III. [Doc. 37 ] FURTHER ORDERED that the claims of Timothy Zike against Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Illinois, Inc., are DISMISSED. FINALLY ORDERED that the stay of discovery entered on September 10, 2009, is lifted. Wi thin ten days of the date of this Order, the parties are to confer and submit a joint revised schedule for the deadlines set forth in paragraphs I(3)(b) through (5) of the case management order entered on March 23, 2009. The case remains set for trial on April 12, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 11/3/09. (KLH)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Advance America, Cash Advance Centers ofIllinois, Inc., is to file a completed consent/option form within fourteen days of the date of this Order, indicating whether they consent to the undersigned's jurisdiction or elect to have the case transferred to a United States District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 7/28/09. (RJD)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting 33 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint and to Add Party Defendant. Signed by Mag Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 7/6/09. (RJD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Zike v. Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Missouri, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Missouri, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kurt D. Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timothy R. Zike | |
| Represented By: | Thomas M. Schneider |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
