Lawson et al v. deBoer Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff: Daniel H. Lawson, Sarah Lawson and Sam Lawson
Defendant: deBoer Transportation, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2009cv00250
Filed: February 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Frederick R Buckles
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs Submittal of Attorneys Fees and Expenses (Docket No. 37 ) is granted in part and denied in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs shall recover of defendants deBoer Transportation, Inc ., and Elmer Royce Abshier, Jr., reasonable attorneys fees in the amount of Nine Thousand, Two Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($9,265.00), with such fees to be apportioned and paid to the law firm of Curtis, Heintz, Garrett & OKe efe, P.C., in the amount of Seven Thousand, Seven Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($7,700.00); and to the law firm of Langdon & Emison, in the amount of One Thousand, Five HundredSixty-Five and 00/100 Dollars ($1,565.00). Signed by Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles on 12/9/09. (KJF, )
May 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this cause is hereby remanded to the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, for all further proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all motions which remain pending in this cause are denied withou t prejudice to be refiled, if appropriate, in State court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, not later than May 22, 2009, plaintiffs shall submit to the Court a statement of their costs and any actual expenses, including attorneys fees, incurred as a resul t of this improvident removal. denying 20 Motion to Strike ; denying 21 Motion for Leave to ; denying 8 Motion to Dismiss; denying 9 Motion for Protective Order; denying 10 Motion to Dismiss Case; granting 13 Motion to Remand Case to State Court; denying 15 Motion for Leave to Signed by Mag Judge Frederick R Buckles on 5/11/09. (JWJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lawson et al v. deBoer Transportation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel H. Lawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Lawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sam Lawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: deBoer Transportation, Inc.
Represented By: Hal D. Meltzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?