Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Stolzer et al
| The Cincinnati Insurance Company |
| Mary Ann Duffey and Paul Stolzer |
| 4:2009cv00396 |
| March 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Insurance Office |
| St. Genevieve |
| E. Richard Webber |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Rehearing, to Amend or [for] Entry of a New Order as to the Order of This Court Sustaining Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. #40] is DENIED. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on April 19, 2010. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint [doc. # 23 ] is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. # 14 ] is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Cinci nnati's Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. # 25 ] is GRANTED, in part and DENIED, in part. The Motion is granted with respect to Count I of Cincinnatis Complaint, and otherwise denied as moot. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 2/5/10. (KLH)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 19 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Out of Time filed by Defendant Mary Ann Duffey, Defendant Paul Stolzer. Their reply brief must be filed on or before July 14, 2009. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 7/2/09. (KLH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
