Skillington v. Activant Solutions Inc.
Plaintiff: Mark Skillington
Defendant: Activant Solutions Inc.
Case Number: 4:2009cv00673
Filed: April 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Mary Ann L. Medler
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 49 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration filed by Plaintiff is DENIED; Doc. 49. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Ann L. Medler on 1/4/10. (ARL)
November 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MEMORANDUM OPINION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part; Doc. 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED in regard to Counts I and II of the Amended Complaint; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in regard to Count III of the Amended Complaint;IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Protective Order and to Stay Discovery is GRANT ED, in part, and DENIED, in part; Doc. 31 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Protective Order shall be imposed for attorneys' and Plaintiff's eyes only for documents which may give a competitive advantage to an opposing party or competitor, tra de secrets, confidential business information, and compensation and other informationregarding persons not a party to this lawsuit; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent Defendant asks to stay discovery, the Motion for Protective Order and Stay is DENIED, as moot; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Strike is DENIED; Doc. 30 Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Ann L. Medler on 11/17/09. (LGK)
June 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 6 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Activant Solutions Inc. motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent deft's motion to dismiss addresses that aspect of Count III in which pl tf. seeks compensation for services provided from October 1 through October 10, 2007, the motion to dismiss is denied. FURTHER ORDERED that Counts I and II of pltf's complaint and that aspect of Count III which seeks compensation for services provided through 9/30/07 are dismissed.. Signed by Mag Judge Mary Ann L. Medler on 6/5/09. (LGK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Skillington v. Activant Solutions Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Skillington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Activant Solutions Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?