Lee v. Keefe Commissary Network, Inc. of Missouri et al
| James Arthur Lee |
| Keefe Commissary Network, Inc. of Missouri, Bill McCullen, Charlie Christ, Walter McNeil and Unknown Vickers |
| 4:2009cv00865 |
| June 1, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Audrey G. Fleissig |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER RE 12 : Plaintiff may not proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because he has incurred more than three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). As a result, the Court will deny the motion and direct plaintiff to pay the appellate filing fee. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall pay to this Court the full $455 filing and docketing fees for filing an appeal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file any future documents or pleadings in connection with his appeal directly with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 8/13/09. (CSR)
|
Filing
6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 6/29/09. (CEL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.