Santiago v. Blair et al
Victor Santiago |
Daniel Blair, Timothy Williford, Unknown Fox, Garry Branch, John Doe and Shannon Clubbs |
4:2009cv00933 |
June 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
Texas |
Henry E. Autrey |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 137 OPINION, MEMORANDUM, AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 119 ], is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the claims against Defendants in their official capacities are dismissed. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 11/10/11. (TRC) |
Filing 114 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pltff.'s 100 MOTION to Compel is granted in part and denied in part, as herein provided. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 2/11/11. (CLA) |
Filing 56 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 20 ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 20] is DENIED.. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 7/13/10. (CEL) |
Filing 17 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 15 :IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to reinstate John Doe as a defendant [Doc. #15] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff has until ten (10) days after the close of discovery in this matt er to provide the Court with Defendant Doe's name and address such that service upon Defendant Doe can be effectuated. Plaintiff's failure to provide the Court with such information by this date will result in a dismissal of Defendant Doe, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(b).Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 11/9/09. (CSR) |
Filing 13 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Request for Service of Process," 12 , is Denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is given 30 days from the date of this Order to provide the Court with the proper name and address of Defendant John Doe. Failure to comply will result in dismissal without prejudice of Defendant John Doe. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff cannot ascertain the proper name and address for Defendant Doe within the allotted time period, but is able to so ascertain at a later date, the Court will look favorable upon a Motion to Amend filed by Plaintiff at that time. (Response to Court due by 11/14/2009). Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 10/15/09. (TRC) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pltff.'s 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $6.44 within thirty (30) days of the date of t his Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include upon it:(1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that theremittance is for an original proc eeding.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partialfiling fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will bedismissed without prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants shall reply to plaintiffs claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. ( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 8/28/2009.) Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 7/28/09. (CLA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.