Randolph v. United States of America
| Albert Randolph |
| United States of America |
| 4:2009cv01416 |
| September 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant Albert Randolph's motion and amended motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody are DENIED. [Docs. 1 and 3]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant Albert Randolph has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right such that reasonable jurists would find the Courts assessment of the constitutional claims debatable, or that reasonable jur ists would find it debatable whether the Court was correct in its procedural rulings, and therefore this Court will not issue a certificate of appealability on those claims. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 332, 338 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 9/17/2012. (KSM)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the government's Motion to Produce Affidavit is DENIED. [Doc. 13] Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 7/10/2012. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall return to movant his § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence [Doc. 1 ], along with a copy of this order, for the purpose of obtaining an original signature. The Clerk sh all retain a copy of the said motion in the Courts file until movant submits the motion with an original signature. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant shall file with this Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, a signed § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence. If movant fails to submit an original signed motion within the time allowed, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon submission of a motion bearing movants ori ginal signature, this action shall be submitted to the undersigned for a determination as to whether a show cause order to respondent should be issued. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255; Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases in the United States District Court. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 9/15/09. (KJF, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Randolph v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Albert Randolph | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Dean J. Sauer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
