RPM Ecosystems Ithaca, LLC v. Lovelace Farms, Inc. et al
| RPM Ecosystems Ithaca, LLC |
| Lovelace Farms, Inc., Wayne Lovelace and Judy Lovelace |
| 4:2009cv01512 |
| September 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Lincoln |
| Carol E. Jackson |
| Plaintiff |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
143
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendants Wayne and Judy Lovelace to dismiss [Doc. # 136 ] is denied. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 08/06/2015. (CBL)
|
|
Filing
126
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties cross-motions for summary judgment [Docs. # 80 and # 84 ] are denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if plaintiff intends to pursue claims on behalf of RPM Ecosystems Gulf Coast and RPM Ec osystems Southeast, it shall file a motion for leave to amend its complaint not later than June 18, 2015. The defendant's response will be due seven days after the motion is filed. ( Response to Court due by 6/18/2015.). Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 6/11/15. (KKS)
|
|
Filing
125
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's objections to exhibits [Doc. # 108 ] are overruled.. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 6/8/15. (KKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
