Fischer v. United States of America
| Michael Fischer |
| United States of America |
| 4:2009cv01783 |
| October 26, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| M Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| None |
| M |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant Michael Fischers Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED. [Doc. 1] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability as to any of the dismissed claims raised in movants § 2255 motion. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 342 (2003). An order of dismissal will accompany this memorandum and order. re: 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Petitioner Michael Fischer. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 9/13/10. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -.......IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's Motions to Request Police Report of Detective Dale Perch are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: Movant's motions are GRANTED to the extent the Clerk of the C ourt shall send movant copies of the following sealed documents from United States v. Fischer, No. 4:08-CR-64 CAS Documents 32,58, and 60, including all exhibits thereto. re: 18 MOTION for Discovery filed by Petitioner Michael Fischer, 17 MOTION for Discovery filed by Petitioner Michael Fischer. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 3/4/2010. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's Motions to Request Police Report of Detective Dale Perch are DENIED. [Doc. 6, 13] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movants Motions to Order the Government to Produce Certain Records is DENIED. [Doc. 12, 15] Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 1/28/2010. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -.....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the government's Motion to Produce Affidavit is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the government's Motion for Additional Time to Rile Response to Motion to Vacate, Set Asid e, or Correct Sentence is DENIED. re: 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Respondent United States of America, 3 MOTION to Produce Affidavit filed by Respondent United States of America. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 12/9/2009. (MRC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fischer v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael Fischer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Bert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
