Hale v. Franklin County Police Department et al
| Harvey M. Hale |
| Franklin County Police Department, City of Union Police Department, Unknown Officers to be Named, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and Unknown Burton |
| 4:2009cv01939 |
| November 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Francois |
| Thomas C. Mummert |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED insofar as this action will be dismissed without prejudice. 40 An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 05/03/2011. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to file amended complaint is GRANTED. [Doc. 22] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the amended complaint as to def endants Sargent Pelton, Deputy Jackson, Detective Leon Burton, Officer Williford, and Officer Lovern. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants Sargent Pelton, Deputy Jackson, Detective Leon Burton, Officer Williford, and OfficerLovern shall reply to Plaintiff's claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 6/23/2010. (RJD)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $2.05 within thirty (30) days of the date of th is Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendant Unknown Burton (Detective, City of Union Police Department). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendant Burton shall reply to plaintiff&# 039;s claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 at this time because the identities of these defendants is unknown. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants Franklin County Police Department, C ity of Union Police Department, or Unknown Officers to be Named because, as to these defendants, the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or both. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. An appropriate Order of Partial Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Honorable Carol E. Jackson on 12/14/09. (KXS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
