Prosser v. Nagaldinne et al
| Christopher Lee Prosser |
| Govinarajulu Nagaldinne, Physicians Purchasing Group, Valitas Health Services, Inc., Cleveland Rayford, John Spears, The Missouri Spine Institute, Laurain C. Hendricks, Beverly Morrison, Brenda Burlbaw, Al Luebbers, Lois Cella, Jeff Clark, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Elizabeth Conley, Michael Sands, Ralf Salke, Jewel Cofield, George Lombardi, Melody Griffin, Michael Kemna, Larry Crawford, Tammy Harr, Jill Perkins and John Doe Doctors 1 through 5 |
| 4:2009cv02117 |
| December 23, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Pike |
| Donald J. Stohr |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
255
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Govindarajulu Nagaldinne, MD's Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Dr. Joel Nitzkin 199 and Defendants' Daubert Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert D r. Joel Nitzkin 212 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Report and Opinions of Dr. Richard Lehman 205 is DENIED, in part, and GRANTED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Govindarajulu Nagaldinne, M D's Motion for Summary Judgment 200 is DENIED. The Court denies summary judgment on Count I. The Court dismisses Count II without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants George Lombardi, Melody Griffin, and Gale Bailey's Motion f or Summary Judgment 203 is GRANTED. The Court grants summary judgment on Counts XIII, XIV, XV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Corizon, Inc. f/k/a Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Dr. Michael Sands, Dr. Elizabeth Conley, Dr. Cleveland R ayford, Dr. Beverly Morrison, Dr. Laurain Hendricks, and Lois Cella's Motion for Summary Judgment 208 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. The Court grants summary judgment on Counts III, V, VII, XI, XII, XIII, XIV, XV, and XVII. The Cou rt denies summary judgment on Count VI and X. The Court dismisses Counts IV, VIII, XVI, and XVIII without prejudice. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Motion, and Supporting Memorandum, to Reconsider and Amend Order Regarding Summary Judgment is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/25/13. (LGK)
|
|
Filing
247
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Govindarajulu Nagaldinne, MD's Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiffs Expert Dr. Joel Nitzkin 199 and Defendants Daubert Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs Expert Dr. Joel Nitzkin [2 12] are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Report and Opinions of Dr. Richard Lehman 205 is DENIED, in part, and GRANTED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Govindarajulu Nagaldinne, MDs Motion for Summ ary Judgment 200 is DENIED.IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendants George Lombardi, Melody Griffin, and GaleBaileys Motion for Summary Judgment 203 and Defendants Corizon, Inc. f/k/a Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Dr. Michael Sands, Dr. Elizabeth Conley, Dr. Cleveland Rayford, Dr. Beverly Morrison, Dr. Laurain Hendricks, and Lois Cella's Motion for Summary Judgment 208 are GRANTED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/18/13. (ARL)
|
|
Filing
190
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 189 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct Case Management Order And Memorandam In Support Thereof filed by Plaintiff Christopher Lee Prosser Discovery Completion due by 9/14/2012., Jury Trial set for 2/11/2013 09:00 AM in Cou rtroom 12N before Honorable John A. Ross., Dispositive Motions due by 10/5/2012., Pretrial Conference set for 2/7/2013 03:00 PM in Chambers before Honorable John A. Ross. See order for furthr deadlines.. Signed by Honorable John A. Ross on 2/2/12. (LGK)
|
|
Filing
180
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Valitas Health Services Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 164 ) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable John A. Ross on 11/30/11. (ARL)
|
|
Filing
117
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to strike [Doc. #113] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to file a surreply is granted and said surreply is deemed filed instanter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants George Lombardi and Melody Griffins motion to dismiss, or alternatively, for summary judgment [Doc. #85] is DENIED. 113 85 Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 1/26/11. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -.....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $29.23 within thirty(30) days of the date of this Order.....IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty(30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 USC §1997e(g)(2), defendants shall reply to plaintiff's claims within the time provided by the applicable provisio ns of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B:Prisoner. re: 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Christopher Lee Prosser ( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 2/14/2010.). Signed by Honorable Donald J. Stohr on 1/15/2010. (MRC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
