Howard v. Whiteside et al
Plaintiff: Alvin Howard
Defendant: Leo Whiteside, Patricia Whiteside and Missouri Bone and Joint Center, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2010cv00013
Filed: January 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Charles A. Shaw
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is DENIED. [Doc. 64] Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 12/17/2010. (NCL)
July 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Missouri Bone and Joint Center, Inc.s motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED. [Doc. 44 ]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to strike, construed as a motion for continuance of ruling under Rule 56(f), Fed. R. Civ. P., is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 47 ] Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 7/6/10. (KJF)
May 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -.....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is DENIED without prejudice. re: 36 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Alvin Howard. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 5/11/2010. (MRC)
April 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Patricia Whitesides motion to dismiss the Complaint against her, in her individual capacity, is DENIED. [Doc. 24 ] Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 4/13/10. (KJF)
March 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Leo A. Whiteside's motion to dismiss Count I is Granted. An order of partial dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. re: 12 MOTION to Dismiss Count I :Count I filed by Defendant Leo Whiteside. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 3/4/2010. (MRC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howard v. Whiteside et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alvin Howard
Represented By: John A. Bruegger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leo Whiteside
Represented By: David T. Streett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia Whiteside
Represented By: Grant R Doty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Missouri Bone and Joint Center, Inc.
Represented By: John Talbot Sant, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?