Hargis v. US Bancorp et al
| Bonnie Hargis |
| US Bancorp and JLB Corporation |
| 4:2010cv00027 |
| January 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Jean C. Hamilton |
| Banks and Banking |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that U.S. Banks Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. No. 60) is GRANTED. 60 See Order for further details. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 11/29/2010. (CBL)
|
|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pltff.'s 56 MOTION to Amend/Correct 46 is denied. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 9/27/10. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that JLB Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint 6 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant US Bancorp's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Class Action C omplaint 8 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend 16 is DENIED, in part, and GRANTED, in part. Plaintiff is granted fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order to amend her TILA allegations against U.S. Bank (Response to Court due by 8/7/2010). Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 7/23/10. (TRC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
