Raybourn v. Prudden
Petitioner: Connie Raybourn
Respondent: Cyndi Prudden
Case Number: 4:2010cv00063
Filed: January 13, 2010
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Audrain
Presiding Judge: Lewis M. Blanton
Presiding Judge: Audrey G. Fleissig
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner shall have three additional weeks, to and including 6/26/10, to file a traverse related to her petition for writ of habeas corpus. Response to Court due by 6/26/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 5/19/10. (CLA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raybourn v. Prudden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Connie Raybourn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cyndi Prudden
Represented By: Stephen D. Hawke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?